← Back
GHSA-q9m2-fhv9-3jcf

Path Traversal in potato-annotation (GHSA-q9m2-fhv9-3jcf)

Summary

path traversal in potato-annotation (GHSA-q9m2-fhv9-3jcf). Risk of unauthorized operations or information disclosure. Exploitable via ``validate_path_security``. Mitigation: upgrade to `2.4.5` or later.

AI summary snake-internal / snake-material-v2

A vulnerability tracked as **GHSA-q9m2-fhv9-3jcf** has been found in potato-annotation. Attackers can target a specific entry point like ``validate_path_security`` over the network to misuse the product. Risk of unauthorized operations or information disclosure. CVSS score: ?/10. What to do: upgrade potato-annotation to **2.4.5** or later. If unsure, ask your IT team or search "potato-annotation GHSA-q9m2-fhv9-3jcf" on the vendor's site.
GHSA-q9m2-fhv9-3jcf (potato-annotation) — CWE-22 / Attack surface: `validate_path_security` / `startswith` / `validate_file_paths` / `validate_training_config` Patched: `2.4.5` — apply immediately Plan: 1) Audit SBOM/dependencies, 2) Stage→prod upgrade, 3) Add WAF/proxy monitoring on affected endpoints, 4) Hunt IOCs in logs. Refs: see the GHSA / vendor advisory / patched release linked on this page.
❓ What is the problem
**Path traversal** (CWE-22) exists in potato-annotation. Attackers reach the vulnerable code path via ``validate_path_security`` without authentication.
📍 Affected scope
potato-annotation — . Attack surface: `validate_path_security` / `startswith` / `validate_file_paths` / `validate_training_config`.
🔥 Severity
Severity: ?. Risk of unauthorized operations or information disclosure
🔧 How to fix
Update to **2.4.5**.
🛡️ Workaround
Until the patch is applied: disable the affected feature, apply WAF rules, or restrict access via network ACLs.
🔍 Detection
Search webserver/proxy logs for unusual request patterns matching this CVE's known IOCs. Run `grep -r 'potato-annotation' .` against your dependency files (package-lock.json, requirements.txt, go.sum) to find affected services.

Response Actions (7 steps)

Concrete steps and command examples for SOC/SRE teams to execute in order

  1. 1
    Identify exposure identify
    grep -r 'potato-annotation' . | grep -v node_modules

    リポジトリと本番環境の依存ファイル (package-lock.json / requirements.txt / go.sum / Gemfile.lock 等) で `potato-annotation` を grep し、稼働しているサービス・バージョンを把握する。

  2. 6
    Apply patch patch
    Upgrade potato-annotation to 2.4.5

    ステージング環境で 2.4.5 に上げて回帰テスト → 本番反映。回帰テストはアプリの主要ハッピーパスと、Step 3 で見つけた異常検知の続報チェックを含めること。

  3. 7
    Post-deployment verification verify
    Confirm patched version is live in production

    パッチ適用後、ステージングで PoC または同等の悪用パターンを再現して脆弱性が閉じたことを確認。本番では Step 3 と同じログクエリでアラート再発が無いか継続監視。

Affected packages

pip potato-annotation
[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"2.4.5"}]}]

References

🍪 About cookies

We use cookies to keep you logged in, remember your language, and improve the service.

Details →